Argument Analysis Paper - Different TypesArgument analysis paper is basically a set of supporting facts, diagrams and graphs designed to make a case for a position. Arguments often come down to two contrasting views which will often become heated and acrimonious before one side or the other gives up and backs down. The argument analysis paper is designed to hold the reader's attention by making them think through each side's position and bring out as much supporting evidence as possible, by questioning that which is being argued, and by testing the validity of that which is being argued.
There are different types of argument analysis paper, the most common of which is the dilemma. This type of argument is designed to show both sides of an argument as if the conflict had already happened and, at the same time, provide facts to support what was stated in the written argument. The most important fact that the writer will try to prove is that the opposing side has made a mistake. They will then take the opposite position that they believe will fix the mistake, thus showing that the facts are completely opposite from what the opposing side claims.
This type of argument has been the focus of much controversy, for it is intended to demonstrate that there is no basis for the opponent to base their stance on, nor is there any logical deduction. It is designed to make the argumentation process useless, as it makes an argument meaningless and proves that any debate about a subject is a pointless exercise.
A second type of argument is where the writer will make a statement about a particular situation and the opposing side will respond to this statement, pointing out flaws in the statement or contradicting it. The writer is then required to disprove these flaws or disprove their opponent's statements.
For example, say the writer states 'If Hitler took over Italy's banks, it would cause financial meltdown because he has the money and they don't'. Now, let's assume that Hitler takes over Italy's banks. If we apply this statement to the situation, then the argument works, since we know that he doesn't and if he did, this would cause economic turmoil.
However, this does not prove that Hitler will cause any financial problems, so the logical inference is that he can't. So, it's really not proof that he will cause any problems.
In the error analysis paper, the writer must prove the conclusions and the logic used to reach those conclusions. The easiest way to do this is by providing evidence and proof. If the argument does not work, then you must prove that it will fail and show the logical flaw in the logic used.
For example, an error analysis paper could state 'If Hitler took over Italy's banks, it would cause financial meltdown because he has the money and they don't'. However, this statement will not prove that he will cause any financial problems, because it only shows that he would, and if he does, this would cause economic turmoil. Therefore, we must show that it will fail and prove that it fails by offering evidences to show that it does.